Subscribe to The Jewish Standard free weekly newsletter

 
font size: +
 
Focus on Jewish education

$80 million-a-year business deserves serious scrutiny

 
 
 

Beginning with this issue, The Jewish Standard begins a weekly column on issues of Jewish education in our area. It is written by noted educator Dr. Wallace Greene. In this first column, he explains why we believe this column is necessary.

There are many multi-million dollar businesses in northern New Jersey. When one considers the total amount of tuition and salaries paid, the cost of bricks and mortar, infrastructure, and other ancillary costs, the enterprise known as Jewish education is one of the biggest industries in our community. We estimate it at somewhere around $80 million a year.

Clearly, the staggering costs involved in maintaining our congregational schools, nursery programs, day schools, special needs programs, and adult learning make Jewish education worthy of our attention.

Every study has shown that the key to our Jewish future lies in Jewish education. Jewish identity and affiliation after World War II by and large was linked to supporting Israel, opposing anti-Semitism, and creating places for Jewish youth to meet and socialize.

That no longer works in the 21st century. Today, there are so many activities competing for our time, resources, and energies. There is not much in popular culture that is in sync with Jewish values. It is no accident that more and more Jewish communal professionals are coming from the ranks of day school graduates and Jewish camp alumni.

In fact, if we believe that there should be a Jewish future in which our grandchildren will identify as proud, literate, and engaged Jews, and if that requires an investment in some form of Jewish education, then the multiple portals of entry that comprise Jewish education in our community must not only be supported, but we as a community must ask the hard questions, critically (and lovingly) examine the issues, identify problems, and work together to maximize solutions.

That is the raison d’être of this column. Recognizing the multiplicity of options available and the equally multiple opinions of our readers, I shall endeavor each week to present points of view that will focus on specific issues and suggest various approaches to dealing with those issues. Input from readers is encouraged.

There are the big issues, such as the day school tuition crisis, communal priority setting vis-a-vis Jewish education, special needs, post bar/bat mitzvah Jewish education, the effectiveness of one- or two-day-a-week congregational schools, Birthright for teens, the importance of informal/experiential learning, the Jewish camp experience, the concept of community educators working in multiple school settings, and how to play the money game. There are also some nuts-and-bolts issues such as curriculum design, what should a student know when he/she graduates, gifted and talented, the average student, technology, homework, why Yoni can’t read (Hebrew), values-based education, bullying, and school mergers.

I will also discuss some philosophical issues, such as the status of Jewish educators, teaching Judaism vs. teaching about Judaism, innovative programming in synagogues and schools, adult learning, and parents as partners. The list is not meant to be all inclusive, and I am sure that our readers will contribute more ideas.

Not only is Jewish education big business, but it is a growth industry. Like any other business, many factors contribute to success. Sometimes populations shift, age out, and/or move, causing some schools to seek mergers to maintain viability. Other schools are experiencing growth spurts and increased enrollment. Demographics, birth trends, and population shifts will also be explored.

Dr. Wallace Greene, a veteran Jewish educator, has been a teacher, principal, professor, and most recently, the director of Jewish Educational Services for the Jewish Federation of Northern New Jersey. For many years, he also chaired the National Board of License for Teachers and Principals in Jewish Schools in North America.

 
 
 
 
Add a Comment

Name:

Email:

Location:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the word you see in the image below:


Auto-login on future visits

Show my name in the online users list

Forgot your password?

 

Medical marijuana and Jewish law

Permissibility depends on degree of risk

On April 16, Greenleaf Compassion Center in Montclair was issued a permit by the New Jersey Department of Health and Senior Services to begin growing medicinal marijuana. A permit to dispense medicinal marijuana will be issued to Greenleaf when its dispensary is operational. That is expected to occur in about six months.

A physician’s task is to heal and to do no harm. Jewish medical oaths as well as the Hippocratic oath constantly emphasize the palliative aspect of medical care. Jewish law has codified the role of the physician, and prescribes strict standards regarding the treatment of patients.

It has been documented that marijuana is an analgesic for sufferers of nausea related to chemotherapy, appetite, and weight loss related to AIDS, migraine headaches, Alzheimer’s, muscle spasms, fibromyalgia, arthritic pain, glaucoma, and other conditions. If marijuana is superior to other drugs, and concerns raised about its continued usage, we need to analyze a number of pertinent halachic issues. We need to determine whether it is permissible to prescribe marijuana according to Jewish law.

 

Trial of the (last) century

In March 1911, in Kiev, a 13-year-old Christian youth, Andrei Yushchinsky, was kidnapped and murdered. On July 11, 1911, a Jewish man, Menachem Mendel Beilis, was arrested for the crime, which was touted in the czarist-controlled media as a Jewish ritual murder. It was a classic case of the blood libel. A Kiev police detective investigating the case, Nikolai Krasovsky, did not believe that Beilis was guilty. It cost him his career, but even after being fired, he continued his investigations. One hundred years ago next week, on May 30-31, 1912, his findings — including naming the real killers — were published in Kiev newspapers. Nevertheless, Beilis was brought to trial on Sept. 25, 1913. The case, which lasted just over a month, had international news coverage, shining a world spotlight on anti-Semitism in the Russian empire. For many, it gave the czarist government a black eye and helped to spur the exodus of Jews from Eastern Europe. In the end, despite the efforts of the Kiev prosecutors, a jury acquitted Beilis after a few hours of deliberation.

 

Making deserts livable

‘We could feed the world’

Special to The Jewish Standard

Israel is famously known as a land of milk and honey, but it is hardly one that is flowing with water. For Israeli scientists today, maximizing water use is a key focus for research and innovation.

It may also be key to avoiding the regional war everyone says must happen some day — a war for water.

For the scientists, though, the main goal is finding ways to grow plentiful amounts of food in arid lands.

In the midst of harsh desert conditions in the Negev and the Arava, Israel’s long, eastern valley, Israeli researchers and farmers have created a flourishing network of high-tech agriculture. Tomatoes, peppers, olives, cheeses, and grapes blossom from arid land despite the fact that annual rainfall totals are measured in mere inches and the proximity to the Dead Sea produces groundwater that is highly saline.

 

RECENTLYADDED

Trial of the (last) century

In March 1911, in Kiev, a 13-year-old Christian youth, Andrei Yushchinsky, was kidnapped and murdered. On July 11, 1911, a Jewish man, Menachem Mendel Beilis, was arrested for the crime, which was touted in the czarist-controlled media as a Jewish ritual murder. It was a classic case of the blood libel. A Kiev police detective investigating the case, Nikolai Krasovsky, did not believe that Beilis was guilty. It cost him his career, but even after being fired, he continued his investigations. One hundred years ago next week, on May 30-31, 1912, his findings — including naming the real killers — were published in Kiev newspapers. Nevertheless, Beilis was brought to trial on Sept. 25, 1913. The case, which lasted just over a month, had international news coverage, shining a world spotlight on anti-Semitism in the Russian empire. For many, it gave the czarist government a black eye and helped to spur the exodus of Jews from Eastern Europe. In the end, despite the efforts of the Kiev prosecutors, a jury acquitted Beilis after a few hours of deliberation.

 

Trial of the (last) century

Trial amid a world in flux

The Beilis case unfolded in a climate of change in the United States and Europe.

Jews in the United States in the early part of the 20th century were energized by the promise of the good life in “the golden land,” but at the same time aware of anti-Semitism, said Eli Faber, John Jay College professor emeritus specializing in Jewish American history.

In those years, young Jews were beginning to go to college and enter the professions. There was a movement away from the Lower East Side. The Yiddish press was vibrant. Yiddish newspapers were not “Jewish” newspapers, meaning newspapers filled with Jewish content. They were general circulation newspapers like the New York Herald, but written in a language other than English (in this case, Yiddish). Among readers of these newspapers there was a “sharp and keen interest in what was going on in America and in the world,” Faber said.

 

Trial of the (last) century

Fixing ‘The Fixer’

“Blood Libel: The Life and Memory of Mendel Beilis,” includes a discussion concerning the connection between the Beilis case and the novel “The Fixer,” the 1966 Pulitzer Prize winner by Bernard Malamud. The discussion is based on a 2010 article written by Jay Beilis, Jeremy Simcha Garber and Mark S. Stein that appeared in the Benjamin Cardozo Law School review, DeNovo.

The Malamud plot involves the character Yakov Bok, accused of murder in Kiev in the same time period in which the real Beilis case unfolded. As part of the revised Beilis memoir, the editors include numerous instances of what they allege is plagiarism by Malamud.

 
 
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31