Subscribe to The Jewish Standard free weekly newsletter

 
font size: +
 

Birthright: A tonic for the Jewish world

 
 
 

A new report out of Brandeis University not only reaffirms the inspirational effects of a Birthright Israel experience, it shows them to be long lasting. The 10-day trip to Israel is open to Jewish18- to 26-year-olds. According to the report, alumni who participated as far back as eight years ago continue to credit the experience with heightening their sense of connection to Israel and the Jewish people. Compared to age-equivalent non-participants, they are more likely to have become strong advocates for Israel, joined a synagogue or congregation, and married a Jew. But while a Birthright trip is limited to young adults, its full potential to energize the larger Jewish world has yet to be tapped.

“Amazing,” “incredible,” “fantastic” are common characterizations by Birthright participants about the experience. In fact, the new study, which was headed by Brandeis Prof. Leonard Saxe, shows that 73 percent of alumni felt the trip had been very much or somewhat “life-changing.” Only 11 percent said it was not at all life-changing, which includes respondents who might have felt this way because they were already committed Jews.

The effects ripple far beyond the circle of participants. Upon return, a participant’s exhilaration often touches parents, grandparents, and anyone else willing to listen. Hearing a Birthright returnee has inspired many a friend and relative to visit Israel. So Birthright is also an indirect promoter of travel to the Jewish state.

Since the program began 10 years ago, 220,000 young Jews have participated, many of whom previously had little connection to Jewish life. Now, as alums continue their journey of Jewish exploration, they often remain in touch with one another and with Israeli soldiers who rode the buses with them. These are not trivial observations in this age of assimilation and otherwise declining support for Israel among young Jews.

The word is out among wannabe participants, who are both eligible and eager. But here’s a sad statistic: This summer, although some 10,000 Jews went on a Birthright trip, 24,000 were turned down because of lack of funds. (Another 10,000 slots will open for the winter trips.) This year’s $80 million budget would need to double in order to match the demand. Given the recession, now is an especially challenging time to call for a large increase in support. But most wait-listed applicants never reapply, which should prompt a sense of urgency.

Of course, a disappointed applicant might later visit Israel under different auspices or otherwise become engaged in Jewish activities. But the distinctive success of Birthright lies in bringing young people together to share the experience at an optimal period in their development. The transition years into adulthood are a time of introspection about identity. Birthright offers young Jews, especially those who previously felt little connection to their heritage, a singular reference point for the rest of their lives. On the evidence, there is no substitute for a Birthright trip, not only because of how it is framed, but when it takes place in a person’s life.

Which leads to two suggestions: First, seek new sources of funding. Since its inception, Birthright trips largely have been funded by major philanthropists, federations, and the Israeli government. The program has been premised on a free, no-strings offer to participants. This noble intention — that every Jewish young adult has a “birthright” to a free educational trip to Israel — has been overtaken by the program’s success. More important than maintaining the purity of the initial premise is to enlarge the pool of availability. Thus, the terms should be amended. Every participant (or family of a participant) should be encouraged to help cover the cost of a slot for a successor applicant. Those unable at this time should commit to a good faith effort in the next few years.

Second, and more important, Birthright has yet to summon the passionate commitment that has been given to other causes such as support for Israel, the campaign for Soviet Jewry, and the rescue of Ethiopian Jews. Birthright, similarly, could become a central purpose in Jewish life. Its ultimate value deserves community-wide consciousness and financial support — from federations, but also from synagogues, educational institutions, and communal organizations.

Even a fraction of one percent above the dues to these institutions, voluntarily dedicated to Birthright, would open slots for thousands more.

From the pulpit, rabbis, lay leaders, and Birthright returnees could emphasize the importance of Birthright and encourage congregants’ support. Congregational and day schools could seek to integrate Birthright with their own student trips. National and local Jewish agencies could offer financial support and create venues for Birthright alums to participate in their organizations’ activities.

A vast increase in the numbers of givers would enhance the sense of community-wide engagement. The goal should be to transform Birthright from its status as a worthy program to an overarching cause. In the process it would also become a bonding experience for the entire Jewish world.

Disclaimer
The views in opinion pieces and letters do not necessarily reflect the views of The Jewish Standard. The comments posted on this Website are solely the opinions of the posters. Libelous or obscene comments will be removed.
 
 
 
 
Add a Comment

Name:

Email:

Location:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the word you see in the image below:


Auto-login on future visits

Show my name in the online users list

Forgot your password?

 

A public offer to Chabad

When Rabbi Shmuley Boteach approached me to read the manuscript of his newly published book “Kosher Jesus,” I was reticent and even a bit cautious, given the massive and diverse audience of people likely to be affected by his unique perspective on the subject of Jesus. Having now read the book, however, I can say that I was pleasantly surprised to find that his approach resolved many outstanding questions that I myself have struggled with in my religious studies, particularly as they relate to Christianity and its impact on Judaism throughout history.

Still, I felt the need to interrogate Boteach further in order to discover what his intentions had been for penning this latest work on a conspicuously controversial topic. As it turns out, his earliest efforts to uncover the real facts regarding the origin of Christianity stemmed from his exasperation by the treatment unsuspecting Jews received from Christian missionaries who would target them in an attempt to convert yet another Jew to Christianity. So alarmed was Boteach at the pervasiveness of this kind of missionary work that, as a young scholar learning in yeshivah, he was often memorizing long passages of the New Testament in his Hebrew Bible classes. After all, how could he counter the words of others if he had no real knowledge of what they were saying and why they were saying it?

 

 

Our stake in ‘Beit Shemesh’

BEIT SHEMESH — It is raining as I write — a rare, cold, hard rain that is welcomed by Jerusalemites who know that it is good for them and the country. Water, like patience, is a treasured commodity here in Israel: temporarily inconvenient, but better for you in the long run.

Rain is a blessing. We pray for it.

Patience is a blessing. We pray that we have enough of it for each other.

It is a good day to stay inside and reflect on my trip to Israel and to Beit Shemesh, a city about a half-hour west of Jerusalem. Beit Shemesh and the Washington Jewish community have been partners for many years, and partners share responsibility for each other.

 

 

Israel confronts its secular identity

Suddenly, it seems, gender segregation is everywhere in Israel — buses, army bases, Jerusalem sidewalks, Beit Shemesh schoolyards and, above all, the front pages. What is going on here?

Let’s start with the buses. In the late 1990s, at the request of some charedim, the Transportation Ministry created bus lines that served charedi neighborhoods and cities. On an officially “voluntary” basis, women would enter the buses and sit in the back. These buses were deemed legally permissible because Israeli law allows discrimination when it is necessary to provide access to public services and does not harm the common weal. All the fundamental questions (necessary? common weal?) were left wide open.

 

 

RECENTLYADDED

Arab anti-Semitism, from indifference to complicity

WASHINGTON – Anti-Israel sentiment in the Middle East is not merely characterized by sharp political differences. It mimics and is fueled by the most defamatory and dangerous of historical anti-Jewish themes. For confirmation, we need look no further than a widely published political cartoonist, a Jordan-based Palestinian named Emad Hajjaj. His cartoons regularly feature blatant incitement, equating Israel with the Third Reich, crudely caricaturing Jews as bloodthirsty monsters, portraying menorahs as weapons, and showing the “crucifixion” of Palestinians on a cross marked by a Star of David.

None of this is exceptional. What is surprising, or should be, is the international indifference to — indeed, complicity in — vile and incendiary Arab anti-Semitism without parallel, quantitatively or qualitatively, on the Israeli side of the regional divide. Yet B’nai B’rith has found that among those claimed as clients by Hajjaj’s public relations firm Abu Mahjoob Creative Productions Company are not only several local government bodies, but also foreign organizations such as the British Council and the major corporations Visa, Orange, the German industrial giant Siemens, and others. If this was not bad enough, the firm’s client list features multiple agencies of the United Nations — including the United Nations Development Fund for Women (now merged into U.N. Women), the United Nations Development Programme and the United Nations Children’s Fund, or UNICEF.

 

 

Racism’s antidote

Over the past weeks, protests have spread throughout Israel calling for a response to racism targeted at the country’s Ethiopian community. Sparked by a Channel 2 story on discrimination in Kityat Malachi, citizens have taken to the streets to show their outrage at the status quo. Although the despicable slurs and actions that triggered these protests are blatant examples of these grievances, they conceal a deeper issue.

Beyond more overt examples, Ethiopian Israelis are often considered less desirable neighbors, and frequently have a harder time finding a job. They are perceived as a poor, underprivileged community, and face the stigma of lacking the capability to contribute equally, even if this myth is belied by reality. Some of this is outright racism, but the rest is symptomatic of a deeper and far more widespread prejudice: indirect or concealed racism.

 

 

A charedi hero’s plea

JERUSALEM — The recent violence in Beit Shemesh and in Jerusalem’s Mea Shearim neighborhood has led me to speak out against the so-called “sikrikim” in the harshest possible terms, equating their actions to terrorism. Sikrikim — Sicarii-ites — is the name given to a fringe anti-Zionist vigilante group, loosely linked to Neturei Karta and said to have been at the forefront of many of the recent violent attacks against innocent Israelis.

In my mind, there is a dangerous similarity in their actions and those of Islamist terrorists. I do not use this comparison lightly. As the founder of the ZAKA rescue and recovery organization, I know only too well the horror of terror.

 

 
 
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29