Subscribe to The Jewish Standard free weekly newsletter

 
font size: +
 

Changing Englewood’s house of terror into a home of Jewish values

 
 
 

Press reports this week stated that I was seeking to buy the Libyan compound next door to me in order to establish an international center for Jewish values. These reports are accurate.

Truth regardless of consequences

Aside from wanting to push the Libyans out of New Jersey, which has 39 families that still grieve over loved ones lost over Lockerbie, I have long wished to establish a permanent institute for the identification and dissemination of Judaism’s core values. A place where scholars and students can publish Judaism’s answers to the great social challenges facing our nation. A values-based institute that will do for Judaism what, say, the Heritage Foundation has done for Conservatism, spreading Judaism’s unique wisdom on the great issues of our time.

America faces four great social crises. The first is growing materialism and an addiction to greed. The second is the collapse of the family, skyrocketing divorce rates, and singles who date recreationally but do not commit. The third is the dominance of celebrity culture and an obsession with fame, rendering non-showy achievement almost irrelevant by comparison. And the fourth is the depression and unhappiness that is becoming endemic in American society, with the United States consuming three quarters of the earth’s anti-depressants and one out of three American women on Prozac, Zoloft, or Paxil.

These four challenges will only be addressed through a new set of American values. No longer can the Forbes 400 determine who matters. And there must be some stigma attached to men who make a buck and immediately drop a wife of 25 years in favor of some hot young thing. Likewise must teenagers learn that helping their parents with household chores and volunteering to raise money for Haiti is more noble than winning “American Idol.” And happiness? Well, that can only come from a life that has purpose. Narcissism is a prison that breeds loneliness and depression.

Never before has Judaism been so much in need for its values. While Christianity speaks of getting into heaven, Judaism says that paradise is found around a functional family that gathers for Friday night Shabbat dinners. While Islam seems obsessed with its humiliation at the hands of Western power and progress, Judaism says real shame stems from taking a noble world religion and treading on God’s greatest teaching, to love one’s fellow man as oneself, and to treat others as we ourselves wish to be treated, as Hillel declared.

Pat Robertson may have indicted all of Haiti for having, as he says, been in league with the devil. But Judaism cites the example of Abraham who lifted his fists to the heavens when notified of the coming destruction of Sodom, crying out to God, “Shall the Judge of the entire earth not Himself practice justice?” It speaks of Moses challenging God that if He were indeed to destroy the Jews after the sin of the Golden calf, then, “Blot my name out of your Torah.” Where Christian leaders indict man and exonerate God in the wake of Hurricane Katrina, Jews have always accused God and exonerated man whenever innocents have perished. God does not need defense attorneys. But vulnerable and powerless humans do.

How is it that we have kept all these treasures to ourselves? Yes, we are not a proselytizing people, believing that one need not become a Jew in order to draw close to God. Each of His children may have a relationship with Him by living a righteous life, however they were born and whatever they believe.

But there is so much healing the world can gain from Jewish wisdom. Should we not try and give America a single national family dinner night, on Fridays, where kids stop texting and parents start talking? Should we not teach men that while evolution says they are walking sperm banks, Judaism says they are, at heart, not sex but intimacy seekers, and that, try as they might to find sexual adventure with women other than their wives, they will never be satisfied because only their soul mate can understand their heart? Would this teaching not have saved Tiger Woods, who acted as a champion on the golf course but as a slave to his libido?

Christianity maintains that people do not have real choice, that notwithstanding righteous action they were born in sin and only faith in Christ can save them. Freud likewise maintained that we are not the masters in our mental household, as we might have supposed, and that an uncivilized id would always rear its ugly head. Modern science echoes the sentiment with its emphasis on genetic predisposition that goes against the belief we are in control of our actions. But amid this triple assault on free will, Judaism stands alone in maintaining, as its most basic foundation, that our lives are unscripted and we can become whatever we choose to be. Astrology is a sham, as is every other supposed limitation on our capacity to chart our own destiny.

I am currently embroiled in a dispute with my congressman, Steve Rothman, for his press release defending the Libyan ambassador’s right to dwell in Englewood based on an agreement he helped broker 27 years ago. Likewise, I am profoundly disappointed with Englewood’s city officials for allowing the Libyans to live tax-free, even as they have now informed me that they are beginning to bring pressure on the Libyans to pay for basic city services rather than having Englewood’s hard-pressed citizens, who are taxed to the max, subsidize an oil-rich dictatorship.

But I am prepared to bury the hatchet with both groups if they do the honorable thing and get behind a sensible plan to transform the Libyan mission from a home, quite literally, of an enemy of the State of Israel — Ambassador Shalgham recently accused Israel of war crimes in the UN Security Council, and last March his mission accused Israel of turning Gaza into a concentration camp — into an institute for the dissemination of family values, moral instruction, and a higher life-calling.

My congressman and city officials can begin by approaching the Libyans to discuss a sale and to inform them, in no uncertain terms, that their sojourn in Englewood is simply untenable. I look forward to their response.

Disclaimer
The views in opinion pieces and letters do not necessarily reflect the views of The Jewish Standard. The comments posted on this Website are solely the opinions of the posters. Libelous or obscene comments will be removed.
 
 
 
 
Add a Comment

Name:

Email:

Location:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the word you see in the image below:


Auto-login on future visits

Show my name in the online users list

Forgot your password?

 

Fast day as Shoah memorial?

One of the most unusual fasts on the Jewish calendar fell out on Thursday of this week — the Fast of the Tenth of Tevet.

Most Jews are not even aware of it nowadays, but once upon a time, it was considered so significant that an exception was made for it, so that it may be observed even on the eve of Shabbat.

With the exception of Yom Kippur, fasts are prohibited on Shabbatot and on the day that precedes it, meaning Friday. For that reason, calendar adjustments were made 1,800 years ago to prevent any statutory fast from occurring on a Friday.

 

 

Rise of our own radical right

Three forms of religious extremism confronted me recently. The first occured in England, when I lectured at Limmud, a studies conference attended by fully one percent of all Jews in Britain. Every Jewish group was represented — except for the Orthodox rabbinate, which boycotted the event because of the presence of Reform and Conservative (Masorti) rabbis.

The second and more insidious example of frightening religious intolerance hit me as I landed in Israel a few days later for the press launch of my book “Kosher Jesus.” I discovered a country up in arms because a small group of charedim spat at and cursed an Orthodox eight-year-old girl for her “immodest” dress (she was wearing a knee-length skirt with shoulders and elbows covered), and because a charedi man called a female Israeli soldier a “whore” for refusing to move to the back of a bus (he was arrested).

 

 

A rabbi’s ban

By right, I ought to thank Rabbi Immanuel Schochet for banning my book “Kosher Jesus,” because doing so further propelled it up the international bestseller lists, even in pre-publication. Bizarrely calling his own views “authoritative,” Schochet declared my book to be heresy, banned anyone from reading it, banned me from speaking about it, banned others from inviting me to speak about it, and refused to offer a single reason or explanation as to why.

This dictatorial edict follows a growing wave of religious fanaticism hitting the world Jewish community all at once with right-wing reactionaries seeking to impose a primitive dogmatism on those who believe Judaism can be Orthodox yet informed, Torah-based yet educated, true to halachic sources yet fearless in the marketplace of ideas. The Jewish community is not Iran and its rabbis are not the Revolutionary Guard. Let the ayatollahs burn books and condemn authors. Jews are the people of the book, not the people who ban books. We have all too much experience with the medieval practice of outlawing books. Schochet’s attack deserves to be pasted on a wall of Meah Shearim, not sent by mail, as it was, to Chabad emissaries around the world.

 

 

RECENTLYADDED

Choosing trees over love

My column this week is adapted from an earlier version. Sometimes, what you have already written about a subject or issue is worth repeating rather than rewriting.

This Wednesday, Feb. 8, is Tu Bi-Sh’vat, aka the New Year for Trees, Judaism’s millennia-old “Earth Day.” Less than a week later comes Feb. 14, aka Valentine’s Day; Saint Valentine’s Day, to be precise.

It is a safe — and sad — bet that more Jews will celebrate the former than the latter. As one person pointedly explained to me, Valentine’s Day “is an American holiday that celebrates love.” The inference, of course, is that Judaism has no such glorious day on its calendar.

 

 

A rabbi’s ban

By right, I ought to thank Rabbi Immanuel Schochet for banning my book “Kosher Jesus,” because doing so further propelled it up the international bestseller lists, even in pre-publication. Bizarrely calling his own views “authoritative,” Schochet declared my book to be heresy, banned anyone from reading it, banned me from speaking about it, banned others from inviting me to speak about it, and refused to offer a single reason or explanation as to why.

This dictatorial edict follows a growing wave of religious fanaticism hitting the world Jewish community all at once with right-wing reactionaries seeking to impose a primitive dogmatism on those who believe Judaism can be Orthodox yet informed, Torah-based yet educated, true to halachic sources yet fearless in the marketplace of ideas. The Jewish community is not Iran and its rabbis are not the Revolutionary Guard. Let the ayatollahs burn books and condemn authors. Jews are the people of the book, not the people who ban books. We have all too much experience with the medieval practice of outlawing books. Schochet’s attack deserves to be pasted on a wall of Meah Shearim, not sent by mail, as it was, to Chabad emissaries around the world.

 

 

Stunning stability

In 1948, two social scientists published the first scholarly study of religious group voting patterns in the United States. According to the authors, Catholics, Jews, and Baptists identified as Democrats by margins of two to one or better. Five denominations that we would classify as mainline Protestants were Republican by equally lopsided ratios. Although the authors did not report on black Protestants, most of whom were still forbidden to vote by Jim Crow laws, data collected at the time showed African-Americans evenly split in loyalty between the two parties.

Sixty years later, the exit polls from 2008 show that almost nothing is the same. Baptists have swung across the spectrum; they and their fellow Evangelical Protestants now constitute the single most pro-Republican religious bloc. Catholics and African-Americans have traded places, the former now divided almost evenly between Democrats and Republicans, and the latter overwhelmingly favoring Democratic candidates. Once the core of the Republican vote, the shrinking body of mainline Protestants increasingly sits out elections or, while still identifying as Republican, tends to favor Democrats by small margins.

 

 
 
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29