Subscribe to The Jewish Standard free weekly newsletter

 
font size: +
 

Let’s work to end uncouth behavior all around

 
 
 

Last August, dozens of women launched a protest against the practice of separate men’s and women’s seating on some Israeli public bus routes servicing haredi communities. They boarded the buses and sat down among the men, expecting to provoke some strong reaction.

The women, some of whom were dressed in decidedly non-haredi style, expected to be forced to the area where the women passengers were sitting, but passengers largely just ignored them. On one bus, a haredi passenger did ask the driver to tell the protesters to sit among the other women, but the driver refused and the passenger returned to his seat.

Howls of outrage at the “mehadrin” buses have increased of late, intensified by an Israeli High Court decision on a petition by an Israeli Reform group and an assortment of activists to outlaw separate-seating arrangements on any bus. The court declined to do so, reiterating that the seating arrangement on such buses was voluntary.

In a handful of cases over the years, individuals have been accused of harassing women who wished to sit among the men on such buses. Such bullying is not only unlawful but loutish, and has never been condoned by haredi leaders. (Nor, of course, has the Reform/feminist alliance condoned the action in January of a woman on a mehadrin bus in Ashdod who, after a man asked her to sit among the women, assaulted him with pepper spray. No community, unfortunately, lacks for uncouth members.) The solution to illegal acts, though, is to enforce laws, not to limit the freedom of a company to cater to a subset of its patrons.

Separate-seating buses, which are limited to certain lines, simply accommodate the wishes of some male haredim that they not be distracted by the opposite sex and the wish of some female haredim to have a dedicated “women’s space.”

At first the petitioners wanted only to ensure that ample mixed-seating buses were available to them, an entirely reasonable request. But then, sensing a larger opportunity, the activists decided to make the legal prohibition of separate-seating buses their cause. In the wake of the court’s recent ruling, the activists have chosen to portray the decision as an affront to human rights and haredim as a malevolent force intent on changing the face of Israeli society rather than a community simply seeking to enhance their chosen way of life.

Unmentioned, moreover, by the activists — and unknown to most American Jews — is that when the first separate-seating buses appeared about a decade ago, they were privately run services by haredim for haredim. Israel’s public bus companies, fearing the loss of a substantial number of riders — Israeli haredim are less likely than other Israelis to own cars — made a business decision to co-opt the service. So portraying the mehadrin buses as Trojan horses in a haredi plot to conquer Israeli society is, to put it mildly, fanciful.

The second front that activists have opened in their war against haredim, tragically, is the Western Wall. In 2003, the Israeli High Court, seeking to preserve the traditional ambience and respect for mainstream Jewish religious law at the Wall plaza while accommodating feminists who wanted to hold vocal prayer services and public Torah readings there, set aside an area of equal proximity, and thus equal holiness, to the site of the Holy Temple courtyard for such gatherings.

When a group of activist women recently attempted to flout the decision, taking a Torah scroll out of a bag at the Kotel plaza to chant from it, police intervened and one of the women was detained for a short while. The activists proceeded to claim, falsely, that the detainee had been arrested for wearing a tallit and set about vilifying the authorities and, of course, the nefarious haredim for trying to prevent the Kotel plaza from becoming a showcase for a torrent of non-traditional prayer services.

Adar, the month of Purim, is here, when we Jews commemorate the unity we first attained at Sinai and re-experienced in the time of Esther. We will come together to hear the Megillah read, send each other gifts of food, give alms to the poor. How wonderful it would be were the spirit of the time of Jewish year to lead us all — haredim and progressives, religious and secular, rightists and leftists and middle-of-the-roaders — to shun, indeed renounce, the provocation, fear-mongering, and name-calling that seem to have infected klal Yisrael of late.

JTA

Rabbi Avi Shafran is director of public affairs for Agudath Israel of America.
Disclaimer
The views in opinion pieces and letters do not necessarily reflect the views of The Jewish Standard. The comments posted on this Website are solely the opinions of the posters. Libelous or obscene comments will be removed.
 
 
 
 
Add a Comment

Name:

Email:

Location:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the word you see in the image below:


Auto-login on future visits

Show my name in the online users list

Forgot your password?

 

A public offer to Chabad

When Rabbi Shmuley Boteach approached me to read the manuscript of his newly published book “Kosher Jesus,” I was reticent and even a bit cautious, given the massive and diverse audience of people likely to be affected by his unique perspective on the subject of Jesus. Having now read the book, however, I can say that I was pleasantly surprised to find that his approach resolved many outstanding questions that I myself have struggled with in my religious studies, particularly as they relate to Christianity and its impact on Judaism throughout history.

Still, I felt the need to interrogate Boteach further in order to discover what his intentions had been for penning this latest work on a conspicuously controversial topic. As it turns out, his earliest efforts to uncover the real facts regarding the origin of Christianity stemmed from his exasperation by the treatment unsuspecting Jews received from Christian missionaries who would target them in an attempt to convert yet another Jew to Christianity. So alarmed was Boteach at the pervasiveness of this kind of missionary work that, as a young scholar learning in yeshivah, he was often memorizing long passages of the New Testament in his Hebrew Bible classes. After all, how could he counter the words of others if he had no real knowledge of what they were saying and why they were saying it?

 

 

Our stake in ‘Beit Shemesh’

BEIT SHEMESH — It is raining as I write — a rare, cold, hard rain that is welcomed by Jerusalemites who know that it is good for them and the country. Water, like patience, is a treasured commodity here in Israel: temporarily inconvenient, but better for you in the long run.

Rain is a blessing. We pray for it.

Patience is a blessing. We pray that we have enough of it for each other.

It is a good day to stay inside and reflect on my trip to Israel and to Beit Shemesh, a city about a half-hour west of Jerusalem. Beit Shemesh and the Washington Jewish community have been partners for many years, and partners share responsibility for each other.

 

 

Israel confronts its secular identity

Suddenly, it seems, gender segregation is everywhere in Israel — buses, army bases, Jerusalem sidewalks, Beit Shemesh schoolyards and, above all, the front pages. What is going on here?

Let’s start with the buses. In the late 1990s, at the request of some charedim, the Transportation Ministry created bus lines that served charedi neighborhoods and cities. On an officially “voluntary” basis, women would enter the buses and sit in the back. These buses were deemed legally permissible because Israeli law allows discrimination when it is necessary to provide access to public services and does not harm the common weal. All the fundamental questions (necessary? common weal?) were left wide open.

 

 

RECENTLYADDED

Arab anti-Semitism, from indifference to complicity

WASHINGTON – Anti-Israel sentiment in the Middle East is not merely characterized by sharp political differences. It mimics and is fueled by the most defamatory and dangerous of historical anti-Jewish themes. For confirmation, we need look no further than a widely published political cartoonist, a Jordan-based Palestinian named Emad Hajjaj. His cartoons regularly feature blatant incitement, equating Israel with the Third Reich, crudely caricaturing Jews as bloodthirsty monsters, portraying menorahs as weapons, and showing the “crucifixion” of Palestinians on a cross marked by a Star of David.

None of this is exceptional. What is surprising, or should be, is the international indifference to — indeed, complicity in — vile and incendiary Arab anti-Semitism without parallel, quantitatively or qualitatively, on the Israeli side of the regional divide. Yet B’nai B’rith has found that among those claimed as clients by Hajjaj’s public relations firm Abu Mahjoob Creative Productions Company are not only several local government bodies, but also foreign organizations such as the British Council and the major corporations Visa, Orange, the German industrial giant Siemens, and others. If this was not bad enough, the firm’s client list features multiple agencies of the United Nations — including the United Nations Development Fund for Women (now merged into U.N. Women), the United Nations Development Programme and the United Nations Children’s Fund, or UNICEF.

 

 

Racism’s antidote

Over the past weeks, protests have spread throughout Israel calling for a response to racism targeted at the country’s Ethiopian community. Sparked by a Channel 2 story on discrimination in Kityat Malachi, citizens have taken to the streets to show their outrage at the status quo. Although the despicable slurs and actions that triggered these protests are blatant examples of these grievances, they conceal a deeper issue.

Beyond more overt examples, Ethiopian Israelis are often considered less desirable neighbors, and frequently have a harder time finding a job. They are perceived as a poor, underprivileged community, and face the stigma of lacking the capability to contribute equally, even if this myth is belied by reality. Some of this is outright racism, but the rest is symptomatic of a deeper and far more widespread prejudice: indirect or concealed racism.

 

 

A charedi hero’s plea

JERUSALEM — The recent violence in Beit Shemesh and in Jerusalem’s Mea Shearim neighborhood has led me to speak out against the so-called “sikrikim” in the harshest possible terms, equating their actions to terrorism. Sikrikim — Sicarii-ites — is the name given to a fringe anti-Zionist vigilante group, loosely linked to Neturei Karta and said to have been at the forefront of many of the recent violent attacks against innocent Israelis.

In my mind, there is a dangerous similarity in their actions and those of Islamist terrorists. I do not use this comparison lightly. As the founder of the ZAKA rescue and recovery organization, I know only too well the horror of terror.

 

 
 
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29