Subscribe to The Jewish Standard free weekly newsletter

 
font size: +
 

Why peace must begin at home

 
 
 

Even as President Obama flexes American muscle to ratchet up efforts to reach an Israeli-Palestinian peace agreement, the relationship between Israel’s Jewish and Palestinian-Arab citizens remains the central domestic challenge facing Israel, where closing economic gaps and advancing coexistence and reconciliation are important pre-conditions to fostering a climate of peace in the region.

Some contend that Israeli-Palestinian peace will in itself resolve the longstanding tensions between Israel’s Arab and Jewish citizens. This is, at best, a case of wishful thinking, and a dangerous distraction from the need to address the pressing challenges of equality and tolerance within Israeli society.

On the contrary, fulfillment of Palestinian national aspirations in Gaza and the west bank will only strengthen Palestinian national identity among Israel’s Arab citizens, raise their expectations, and increase international attention on Israel’s internal challenges.

Israeli Arabs are already worried about the negative consequences of peace; most disturbing, the no longer unspeakable possibility of involuntary land transfer of important Arab population centers in the north of Israel in exchange for annexation of large Jewish settlement blocks in the west bank. Such a land swap, part of the harsh political discourse in the last Israeli election campaign, might easily emerge as a viable negotiating option, despite being vigorously opposed by a vast majority of the Arab citizens of that area.

Surely, peace would also bring benefits to Israeli Arabs. As in the post-Oslo period, Israel’s Arab community would likely enjoy the economic benefits of joint, cross-border business ventures and partnerships, and the end of violent conflict might contribute meaningfully to an improved atmosphere for Jewish-Arab relations within Israel.

Nevertheless, at the bottom line, peace with the Palestinians will likely exacerbate the already high level of tension between Jews and Arabs within Israeli society — tension that erupted into deadly violence in October 2000. A state commission of inquiry laid responsibility for the violence, in large part, on “generations of governments [that] failed to show sufficient sensitivity to the needs of the Arab population, and to do enough or try hard enough to create equality and to uproot discrimination.”

Understood in the context of growing socio-economic gaps and an expanding Islamist movement, and with land and collective rights issues on the ascendancy, Israel must address the status of its 20 percent Arab minority with unprecedented urgency.

The Abraham Fund has been working for 20 years to strengthen relations between Israeli Jews and Arabs and to lower the barriers to full inclusion and equality. Much of that historic work has been at the grassroots level, to promote understanding and support collaborative action. But bolder, more ambitious strategies are required today in order to address the root causes, and growing risks, of a deteriorating status quo.

The goal today must be wide-scale reform and transformation of society’s major institutions: national and municipal government, the educational system, law enforcement and the security services, business, media, arts and culture, and academia. It is why future efforts must be focused on national initiatives that are already beginning to re-shape reality:

• initiatives to address the root manifestations of discrimination and inequality in employment, in distribution of government resources, and in land allocations;

• initiatives to mandate the teaching of Arabic language and culture in all Jewish schools, beginning at an early age;

• initiatives to transform the way the Israel police and major branches of government interact with and serve the Arab citizens of the state; and

• initiatives to promote Jewish-Arab cooperation in business, education, and civil society within Israel’s growing number of mixed cities and regions.

Building a shared society for all of Israel’s citizens will require no less than building a new civic culture among Jewish and Arab Israelis. The time is critical to create a national mobilization — a partnership of national and local government, civil society, business and community leaders — to begin to address these issues in the manner required. Here is what will be needed, and what such a mobilization might accomplish:

First and foremost, Israeli leaders across party lines must remove this issue from the political agenda, and shift the status of Israel’s Arab minority, and the future of Jewish-Arab relations, to the mainstream of Israel’s social agenda.

Government must create a strong central authority for equality and coexistence to provide consistent leadership, to monitor the enforcement of existing laws and regulations, and to assure the participation of Israeli Arabs in the formulation of policies that affect their lives.

The state must commit to a significant realignment of spending priorities to narrow the glaring and well-documented gaps between expenditures on behalf of Israel’s Arab and Jewish citizens. Such realignment must include comprehensive reform of the Arab-sector educational system; equalizing allocations to Arab municipalities; improving the quality of public services delivered to the Arab community; and creating incentives for investment in Arab sector development, business, and job creation.

Israel must expand its efforts to legitimize the language and culture of the Arab minority in schools, in government, and in the media and the arts, a critical component of constructing a culture of diversity and mutual respect.

Finally, Jewish and Arab Israelis from all walks of life and sectors of society must initiate a serious national dialogue on the future of Israeli democracy, including a conversation about the rights and obligations of shared citizenship.

The benefits of such a national mobilization are clear:

• economic productivity and self-sufficiency for Israel’s 1.6 million Arab citizens — men and women locked in a cycle of poverty and high unemployment with the potential to contribute much more to the economic, scientific, and cultural vibrancy of the state;

• engaging Israel’s Arab citizens as ambassadors for partnership with the Arab and Muslim world. Both in symbol and substance, there can be no meaningful cross-border business ventures, academic relationships, and cultural exchanges without the active participation of Palestinian-Arab Israelis.

No less important, Israel has the opportunity to create an aspirational model of tolerance, pluralism, and democracy for countries of the Middle East, and for conflict zones around the globe.

Learning to live with our next-door neighbor is a precondition for living with our neighbors across the border. Investing in building a culture of coexistence, opportunity, and equality among Israel’s Jewish and Arab citizens is an investment in the security of the State of Israel, and needs to matter to all those Israelis, and friends of Israel abroad, who are committed to Israel’s peace and prosperity.

Ami Nahshon is president and CEO of The Abraham Fund Initiatives, a not-for-profit, non-partisan organization dedicated to advancing coexistence and equality among Israel’s Jewish and Arab citizens.
Disclaimer
The views in opinion pieces and letters do not necessarily reflect the views of The Jewish Standard. The comments posted on this Website are solely the opinions of the posters. Libelous or obscene comments will be removed.
 
 

 

.(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) posted 15 Oct 2009 at 08:05 PM

Ami Nahshon’s sharp vision for how to improve Israel’s security by prioritizing coexistence in social spheres to forefront institutional advancements is in itself an international progressive model that all nations and communities can benefit from. Many thanks!

.(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) posted 12 Jan 2010 at 05:47 PM

I totally agree with your post. Peace should begin at home.  Melaleuca

 

Add a Comment

Name:

Email:

Location:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the word you see in the image below:


Auto-login on future visits

Show my name in the online users list

Forgot your password?

 

Letters

‘The moral voice of the Senate’

Joe Lieberman is the moral voice of the Senate and former Democratic vice presidential nominee. His comments about Sen. Obama at the NORPAC fund-raiser for Sen. McCain are not that one needs military experience to be president. Rather, Sen. Lieberman acknowledged that Sen. Obama was very talented, but said that he lacked the background and experience to assume the highest office in the land. Sen. Lieberman will likely lose his chairmanship of the Senate Homeland Security Committee and his seniority in the Democratic caucus due to his support of Sen. McCain. That Sen. Lieberman would cross party lines to endorse John McCain says volumes about the merit of both leaders. This crossing of the aisle is a measure of character where one acts according to the belief that his candidate of choice, regardless of party affiliation, is most fit for the position. Whether one agrees with Sen. Lieberman is beside the point. His willingness to put his career and Senate standing in jeopardy for the benefit of his county should be acknowledged and admired.

Ben Chouake, President, NORPAC, Englewood

 

Letters

Blessings of a broken heart

In Sherrie Mandel’s play "The Blessings of a Broken Heart," shown at the JCC [last] Monday night, the actress Lisa Robins portrays Sherrie Mandel, whose son Kobi was brutally murdered in a terrorist attack seven years ago. Robins, the actress portraying Sherrie, shares also her own cry in the play, because she too (as she said in answer to a question after the play) "has so much to cry about."

For me, that line sums up the message of the play. The truth is that no matter how fortunate we are, everybody has something to cry about. As a generation separated, just barely, from the horrors of the Holocaust, we can take a lesson from the Mandels and share our personal grief and sorrow rather than repress and go about our lives — the style adopted by our parents.

 

Letters

‘No better catcher’

I just happened to peruse the article on Jews loving baseball, which asked the question whether there was a Jewish Major League catcher. As a New York Giants fan back in the 1940s, I can tell the answer is a resounding yes. There was no better catcher than Harry Danning of the late great New York Giants. He lived during the season at Hudson View Gardens in Washington Heights and was always available to throw a ball around with the neighborhood kids.

Norm Solon, Bluffton, S.C.

 

RECENTLYADDED

Anna Baltzer, Jewish defamer of Israel

In 1505, a Moravian Jew named Joseph Pfefferkorn renounced his faith and undertook a campaign to get the Talmud banned by claiming it blasphemed Christianity. Pfefferkorn was unschooled and a criminal, but that didn’t stop the Dominicans in Cologne, who at the time were eager to cast aspersions on the Jews, from employing him. They recognized the value of a Jew accusing other Jews.

The practice of finding Jews to bear false witness against other Jews has been repeated in many venues. Today, in America, some mainline Protestant churches have eagerly adopted this practice in an effort to demonize Israel. In November, the Wyoming Presbyterian church in Millburn, N,J., invited Jewish anti-Israel activist Anna Baltzer to speak and present her slide show alleging Israeli crimes against the Palestinians.

 

An open letter to Israel’s Ambassador Michael Oren

As founders and members of the Women of the Wall, Jerusalem, and the International Committee for the Women of the Wall, we turn to you out of concern for Israel as well as our cause.

Those of us who knew you as a professor or community member in the past want to believe that you had no part in drafting the message issued by the embassy in response to the thousands of e-mails that we and our supporters sent following the arrest in November of Nofrat Frenkel for the “crime” of wearing a tallit at the Kotel, carrying a sefer Torah, and letting her voice be heard, and the subsequent fingerprinting and interrogation of Anat Hoffman for the same “crimes.”

 

An open letter to Rabbi Shmuley Boteach

Dear Rabbi Boteach,

I am disturbed and offended by your campaign to purchase the Libyan mission’s property adjacent to your home in Englewood. While I join you in support of your condemnation of the Libyan government, its policies toward Israel, and its failure to take moral responsibility for the deaths of hundreds of innocent Americans, I fail to understand why you refuse to abide by the talmudic principle “Dina Malchuta Dina,” the law of the land in which we live must be observed by Jews. As Rep. Steve Rothman explained in a very detailed statement in response to your initial demand that the Libyans be forced to leave the property they own in Englewood, the issue of the legitimacy of their purchase and continued ownership has been adjudicated. Whether we like it or not, the United States courts have determined that they have the right to own that property.

 

 

S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28