Subscribe to The Jewish Standard free weekly newsletter

 
font size: +
 

Jewish group to Glenn Beck: Haik U

 
 
 

If Glenn Beck has his way, many American Jews would be abandoning their synagogues. If one Jewish group has its way, the popular right-wing talk-show host will be drowned out by a wave of haikus.

Beck — who has called the health care reform legislation “an assault on the republic” and the first African-American president a “racist” — is urging people to quit their churches if the term “social justice” appears anywhere on their Websites. “I beg you, look for the words ‘social justice’ or ‘economic justice’ on your church Website,” Beck said on his nationally broadcast radio program March 2. “If you find it, run as fast as you can. Social justice and economic justice, they are code words.”

image
Glenn Beck says “social justice” has no place in religion. The Rocketeer/flickr

To illustrate the point further, Beck, on his television show, held up cards imprinted with a swastika and the hammer and sickle. Social justice, Beck said, was tantamount to Nazism and communism.

Christian leaders of various stripes were outraged. But surprisingly, considering that a good number of synagogues in the United States would be shuttered if American Jews followed Beck’s advice, Jewish groups haven’t had much to say.

The exception was Jewish Funds for Justice, which recently launched a Website, “Haik U Glenn Beck,” in which users are invited to respond to Beck — poetically.

“Hurling expensive/coffee at the expensive/TV screen now, Ahhh,” wrote the novelist and Daily Beast columnist Christopher Buckley in one of nearly 1,000 haikus submitted during the site’s first week of operation.

The Beck controversy comes at a moment when social justice, for years a growing — and minimally controversial — area of communal activity, has emerged as something of a dividing line between Jewish liberals and conservatives.

Jack Wertheimer, a professor and former provost of the Jewish Theological Seminary of America, sparked a minor uproar last month when, in the March issue of Commentary magazine, he criticized the diversion of community resources to projects aimed at helping non-Jews under the guise of social justice.

More recently, Jennifer Rubin, also writing for Commentary, called President Obama’s Passover message, with its emphasis on a universal social message, “off-key, hyper-political, and condescending.” Obama’s “secularized spiel,” Rubin wrote, denies the holiday’s uniquely Jewish message. At the same time, liberal Jewish bloggers sided with the president, arguing that the retelling of the Exodus story is meant to inspire Jews and others to combat injustice.

Such talk, but especially Beck’s comments, are a sign of desperation, said Mik Moore, the chief strategy officer at Jewish Funds for Justice.

“It’s part of a broader assault, in this instance, on faith communities that put social justice at the center of their work,” Moore said. “It stems from a fear that the side that rejects the relationship between Judaism and social justice, that they’re losing.”

It’s noteworthy that the tension between Jewish particularism and wider social concerns should come to a head around Passover, perhaps the most expansively understood and universally resonant of all Jewish holidays. Passover seders have long been an occasion for interfaith dialogue, and Jewish groups routinely organize seders around such diverse themes as labor rights, children’s nutrition, and the civil rights struggle.

Jewish conservatives, for their part, don’t call for Jews to abandon wide social causes altogether, but rather to find a better balance between them and the specific needs of the Jewish community.

“Nobody here is claiming that we need to expunge a universalist frame of reference from our Jewish point of view,” said Jonathan Tobin, the executive editor of Commentary, who asserted that putting Beck and Wertheimer in the same category is “screwy.”

“What we’re saying is, when things get out of whack, when you are primarily interested in the universal agenda, then the Jewish end of it can suffer,” he said.

Newer Jewish nonprofits often claim that social justice is a greater animating cause for younger Jews than the issues traditionally associated with older, more established Jewish organizations. But Tobin believes that if Jewish affiliation and donations to specifically Jewish causes continue to decline, then all Jewish institutions will suffer — the social justice groups included.

“The idea that only Jewish universalism will survive while Jewish parochialism goes down the tubes is, to me, a remarkably foolish point of view,” Tobin said.

For his part, Moore accepts that. Jewish Funds for Justice, he said, wouldn’t be training rabbis and working with synagogues if it was unconcerned with strengthening the Jewish community. “But,” he added, “we’re doing it in a way that is meaningful to them and yet is genuinely rooted in Jewish history and tradition.”

JTA

 
 
 
Rosalie Greenberg posted 09 Apr 2010 at 02:06 PM

“Social Justice” refers to the government mandating a transfer of wealth through taxes.  When people are forced to pay higher taxes or forced to buy health care - that is stealing from the people that work.  Yes, that includes the middle class.  A value added tax and all kinds of other taxes are coming, affecting all of us, not only the upper classes.  Our Torah teaches “Thou shalt not steal.”  Tzedakah is what the Torah mandates, with freedom of choice to give or not give.  We don’t need the government interfering in this area.  “Tyranny in the name of Social Justice, is still tyranny.”

Glenn Beck is a very staunch supporter of Israel and should not be ridiculed.  This is part of the all out propaganda attack against anyone who disagrees with our President’s policies (note the bogus attack on the tea party movement - no video proof that racist slurs and spitting actually happened during March 20th Rally.)  We, as Jews, should be very wary of this, as this was the tool that Goebbels (propaganda minister) used against the Jews to defame, denigrate, discredit and slander us.  Ultimately making it legitimate to kill us.  I am not suggesting that we now our headed for such an end.  However, we must know what is true and what is false.

“Jewish Funds for Justice”  is a far left radical organization with connections to ACORN, George Soros’s Center for American Progress, etc.  See www.jspot.org for a list of their affiliates.  In order for President Obama to “fundamentally change the United States of America,”  he needs to enlist the support of the religious communities, Jews and non Jews alike.  What better way than to convince us all that the taking of money from one segment of society by the government and giving it to another is “socially just.”

Rosalie Greenberg posted 09 Apr 2010 at 03:15 PM

The comment above is from me and not Ben Harris, as mistakenly shown. 

Rosalie Greenberg

 
Add a Comment

Name:

Email:

Location:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the word you see in the image below:


Auto-login on future visits

Show my name in the online users list

Forgot your password?

 

Santorum a tough sell?

Social conservatism may be too much for Jewish vote

WASHINGTON – Rick Santorum’s near-win in Iowa and his fourth place finish in New Hampshire ahead of former House Speaker Newt Gingrich have made him the GOP’s latest “not Romney” candidate to beat. His status as the GOP right’s champion will be put to the test Jan. 21 in South Carolina’s Republican presidential primary. He may have his work cut out for him, however, in attracting Jewish support in the general election if he eventually manages to wrest the nomination from bruised frontrunner Gov. Mitt Romney.

Pro-Israel insiders say the Santorum campaign is now aggressively reaching out to Jewish givers who helped him when he was a U.S. senator from Pennsylvania.

 

Split decision

Jewish GOPers in South Carolina mull vote

Henry Goldberg loves this country. The businessman’s Polish-Jewish parents escaped Nazi Germany and made their home in South Carolina. His father began work as a janitor and eventually became a business owner. These were the opportunities that America offered, and not a moment went by when the elder Goldberg was not thankful for his survival.

This is the background that shaped Goldberg’s Republican views. As the years went by, he and his brother expanded their father’s company, Palmetto Tile Distributors, in Columbia. In the 1950s and 1960s, this was a truly wonderful country, Goldberg said. Doors were left open at night, keys were left in the car, the country was strong militarily, and it was not in debt. Since then, he has seen the country decline into what he views as a welfare state that gives too much of its dollars to such programs as Medicare and Medicaid.

 

Making book on Judaica

Israeli publishers seek U.S. niche by turning to local authors

From Bibles to novels, English-language Judaica from Israel accounts for much of the inventory on American Jewish bookstore shelves.

A case in point: For the first time in his 27-book run, Rabbi Shmuley Boteach has chosen to work with an Israeli publisher: Gefen will produce the Englewood writer’s forthcoming book, “Kosher Jesus.”

Shoppers at the Feb. 5-26 Seforim Sale at Yeshiva University, the largest Jewish book sale in North America (see sidebar), will find Israeli publishers well represented.

Rabbi Yaacov Haber, a former Monsey pulpit rabbi and co-founder of the year-old Mosaica Press in Jerusalem, says there are practical and emotional reasons for this trend.

 

RECENTLYADDED

Weiner quits Congress, apologizes for ‘personal mistakes’

WASHINGTON (JTA) -- Rep. Anthony Weiner resigned and apologized in the wake of a scandal in which he lied about sexually explicit exchanges on social media outlets.

“I am here today to apologize for the personal mistakes I have made and the embarrassment that I have caused,” Weiner (D-N.Y.) said at a news conference Thursday at a home for the elderly in Brooklyn where in the past he has announced his intention to run for office.

 

From praise to anger, Jewish response to Obama’s speech runs the gamut

WASHINGTON – From accolades like “compelling” to accusations like “Auschwitz borders” to radio silence, to label the Jewish response to President Obama’s speech on Middle East policy as diverse understates matters.

The very breadth of the Middle East policy speech — 5,600 words and covering the entire Middle East and decades of history — helps explain the wildly divergent responses from Jewish groups and opinion shapers, even among some who are otherwise often on the same page.

One could as easily pick out points for Israel — slamming the Palestinian Authority’s pact with Hamas as well as its bid for unilateral statehood — as one could the demerits — for many, the most explicit endorsement of the pre-1967 lines as the basis for future borders by any American president.

 

Obama: 1967 borders with swaps should serve as basis for negotiations

WASHINGTON – President Obama said the future state of Palestine should be based on the pre-1967 border with mutually agreed land swaps with Israel.

In his address Thursday afternoon on U.S. policy in the Middle East, Obama told an audience at the State Department that the borders of a “sovereign, nonmilitarized” Palestinian state “should be based on 1967 lines with mutually agreed swaps.”

Negotiations should focus first on territory and security, and then the difficult issues of the status of Jerusalem and what to do about the rights of Palestinian refugees can be broached, Obama said.

 
 
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29