Subscribe to The Jewish Standard free weekly newsletter

 
font size: +
 

Celebrate Israel, don’t demonize Obama

 
 
 

In response to Rabbi Shmuley Boteach’s April 9 column, “Obama and the deafening silence of American Jewry,” I requested and was granted the opportunity to respond. Rather than engaging in a point-by-point debate with Rabbi Boteach’s accusations and demonization of President Obama and Rep. Steve Rothman, I would like to use this space to draw a few historical comparisons.

Guest column

Sixty–two years ago this month I was born into an American Jewish community anxiously awaiting the birth of a Jewish state and deeply divided over what impact that state would have upon themselves and the world. As we prepare to celebrate Israel’s 62nd birthday next week, we can all recite a shehecheyanu that we have lived to see an Israel that is a strong, viable, modern nation-state. Yet as in the anxiety of 1948, American Jews find ourselves divided over the path by which we can help Israel to attain political and military security. In 1948, as the fate of Israel’s creation hung in the balance, a vocal minority of American Jews saw America’s president as being secretly pro-Arab. Some of those opposing the policy of the American government demonized President Truman.

“A Safe Haven: Harry S. Truman and the Founding of Israel,” by Allis and Ronald Radosh, is a recently published scholarly work describing Harry Truman’s decision-making process leading to American support for the founding of the State of Israel. The authors document the fact that the political pressure on Truman from both the American Jewish community and the pro-Arab interests who dominated the State and Defense departments was enormous. The authors make clear that the thrust of the autobiographical accounts by both Truman and Chaim Weizmann, Israel’s first president, was fundamentally accurate. This historical work, based upon archival material, reveals that Truman’s fundamental support for the creation of a Jewish state and the immigration of Jews living in Displaced Persons camps to Palestine never wavered. However, the authors reveal that the president’s responsibility to listen to all sides and weigh the interests of American allies, including Saudi Arabia and Great Britain, led some of the most vocal voices in American Jewry to accuse Truman of being an anti-Semite. Moreover, Jews who were supporting Truman and lobbying him privately rather than publicly were looked upon by the more militant segments of American Jewish life as self-hating Jews.

“A Safe Haven” was an important book for me to read at this particular time in American–Israel relations. The most militant Zionist critic of Truman ‘s Mideast policies was a Reform rabbi from my hometown of Cleveland, Ohio, Rabbi Abba Hillel Silver. History reveals that while Silver’s strong pro-Israel voice played an important role in the halls of the United Nations and the court of public opinion, his personal and at times vicious attacks upon Truman served to only to anger the president and give support to those of Truman’s advisers who were against statehood for the Jewish people.

Last week, attacks similar to those made by Rabbi Silver on President Truman were made by Rabbi Shmuley Boteach on President Obama in The Jewish Standard. I respect Rabbi Boteach’s right to differ with me or my friend Congressman Rothman on the substance of any issue in Jewish life. What I reject is the classification of either of us as anything but proud Americans and proud Jews who in the spirit of Justice Louis Brandeis proclaim publicly that our support for a secure Israel is integral to our American patriotism.

Barack Obama was elected to be president of the United States. I voted for him for many reasons, including my belief that he would maintain the strong bipartisan support for Israel that has been a cornerstone of American foreign policy since Harry Truman. While the disagreements between Obama and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu have caused a public outcry, relations between America and Israel have been much worse in years past. American-Israel relations were also been strained in the 1956 Suez Crisis during the Eisenhower administration, the “Rogers plan” of President Nixon in 1969, the infamous rebuke of Israel by Secretary of State James Baker during the George H.W. Bush administration, as well as during the tension surrounding the Begin-Carter-Sadat summits.

Since the attacks made by Rabbi Silver upon President Truman in 1948 until the verbal assault of Rabbi Boteach upon President Obama in last week’s Standard, no responsible American Jewish leader has demonized a sitting president and questioned his attitude toward Jews and Judaism as Rabbi Boteach did. Sovereign nations, even allies, will not always agree on every issue. In democratic countries all citizens are not forced to agree with every policy of their government. Therefore it’s not that Rabbi Silver was critical of President Truman or that Rabbi Boteach disagrees with President Obama or Congressman Rothman that bothers me — but rather that they demonize the president.

At Shavuot services next month we will hear the chanting of the Ten Commandments. The ninth of these statements reads: “You [singular] shall not bear false witness against your neighbor.” Its application here is simple and direct. It is a sin for any of us to slander or to defame others. Terms such as racist or anti-Semite must be carefully used and never abused. Disagreement with the policies of an American president regarding Israel does not give one the right to classify President Obama or President Truman as an anti-Semite or anti-Israel. It’s time for us all in Jewish life and in American life to turn from calling each other names and call upon the One whom we refer to as the Name with gratitude on this Yom Ha’Atzmaut that we live in a time when there is a free, independent State of Israel and a United States of America where we Jews can freely exercise our religious practices and speak our minds.

Temple Sholom, River Edge, Reform
Disclaimer
The views in opinion pieces and letters do not necessarily reflect the views of The Jewish Standard. The comments posted on this Website are solely the opinions of the posters. Libelous or obscene comments will be removed.
 
 
 
HARRY posted 18 Apr 2010 at 04:22 PM

LETTER TO JEWISH STD.

I hope that the Jewish Standard gives me the opportunity to respond to Rabbi Borowitz’s personal attack and continuing vendetta against Rabbi Boteach.  In his article, Rabbi Borowitz’s states “It’s time for us all in Jewish life and in American life to turn from calling each other names”.  Obviously that suggestion does not apply to Rabbi Boteach.  The leader of ‘Rabbis for Obama’ and friend of Rep. Rothman is doing his best to defend his political choice and his friend.  Fair enough.  But should that include demonizing Rabbi Boteach. 
Also, it is obvious that the dispute between Boteach and Rothman has created great personal animosity.  Too bad.  It does weaken Boteach’s position.  But I guess that it is too much to expect our rabbis/teachers to be ideal role models. 
Back to Borowitz vs Boteach.  I reread Boteach’s article.  And yes Boteach did demonize the Arab dictators, Islamic nations, Ahmadinejad, etc.  No where did I see our President demonized.  I did see very strong political criticism of our President.  I did see strong criticism of those who do not condemn the treatment of Israel and Netanyahu by our President.  The fact that we can criticize the President and his administration should make Rabbi Borowitz and all of us very happy.  It is the very essence of our democracy.  It is not wrong in applying political pressure on our elected officials. 
Ed Koch, made exactly the same point as Rabbi Boteach.  “—where are our Senators, Schumer and Gillibrand?  And, where are the voices, not only of the 31 members of the House and 14 Senators who are Jewish, but the Christian members of the House and Senate who support the State of Israel?  Where are the peoples’ voices?”.  Many Jewish-Americans and non Jewish-Americans are raising their voices.  Rabbi borowitz remains silent.  He will not even state his opinion regarding the U.S.-Israel dispute. 
So I ask Rabbi Borowitz to join me and many other Americans in clearly, politely, and loudly stating: I recognize that the introduction by the Obama administration of the settlements issue as a precondition to peace talks was strictly a red herring which placed a road block on the road to peace.  The inclusion of east Jerusalem as a settlement made it impossible for any PM of Israel to agree to the demand. 
In escalating an ill timed statement for which Netanyahu has publicly apologized into a major crisis between America and Israel, Obama has again reduced the chances of peace.  There is no need for the Palestinians to negotiate at a face to face peace conference.  The Palestinians can sit back and wait for Obama to extract more one sided concessions from Israel. 
I do not question Obama’s intentions but I strongly question his ability, policy, and handling of the Israel-Palestine peace process.  And meanwhile, Iran continues to develop its nuclear weapons.

 
Add a Comment

Name:

Email:

Location:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the word you see in the image below:


Auto-login on future visits

Show my name in the online users list

Forgot your password?

 

Welcome change

WASHINGTON — For decades, the Jewish community here in the United States has debated the advisability, constitutionality, and necessity of government aid to parochial schools, Jewish and otherwise. With the United States still experiencing tough economic challenges, however, we find our schools under greater financial stress than ever. This reality, alongside the solidification of court rulings upholding government aid programs and a current of broader education reform, has positioned 2012 to be a year in which we see signs of a sea change within the Jewish community over this perennial issue.

Since the mid-1950s, the majority view within the Jewish community has opposed government aid to parochial schools on the grounds that it diverts funds from the public schools, somehow “breaches the wall of separation” between religion and state, and runs counter to the communal responsibility to support our own institutions.

 

 

Christie unfit to be veep

A Quinnipiac poll in April showed Gov. Chris Christie to be the most popular potential Republican vice presidential candidate, thanks to his budget cuts and standing up to government employee unions. The state’s governor has a problem, however, specifically an Islam problem, that can and should get in the way of his possible ascent to higher office; he has sided time and again with Islamist forces against those who worry about safeguarding United States security and civilization.

 

 

Imprisoned in Bolivia

 

RECENTLYADDED

Dropping the education ball

This weekend, we celebrate Shavuot, the festival known as z’man matan torateinu — the time of the giving of the Torah. The Torah does not refer to Shavuot in this way, but the chronology it gives for the journey from Egypt to Sinai is strongly suggestive, as Rabbi Adin Steinsaltz notes in his article on page 18.

Because Shavuot, the celebration of Torah, focuses on learning, education — specifically, Jewish education — is a proper topic for this week’s column.

What makes it an urgent column is an e-mail I received a couple of weeks back as a member of the North Jersey Board of Rabbis (NJBR). It informed the community’s rabbis that the Jewish Federation of Northern New Jersey (JFNNJ) in effect was cutting its last lines of support to Jewish education in the areas of Bergen, Passaic, and Hudson counties that it serves.

 

 

Flagging the truth

If ever there was any doubt about who we are and what our place is in the world, that doubt should have been erased on a Friday afternoon in Tel Aviv 64 years ago, when David Ben-Gurion stood before a packed room and declared that it was “the natural right of the Jewish people to be masters of their own fate, like all other nations, in their own sovereign State.”

As he stood there, Ben-Gurion, as always, was mindful of both Jewish history and world history. He knew that what he was about to do had never been done by any other expelled people. He knew how impossible it was for this to be happening. And yet, there he was, saying the words Jews only dreamed about hearing for nearly 2,000 years.

 

 

Imprisoned in Bolivia

 
 
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31