Subscribe to The Jewish Standard free weekly newsletter

 
font size: +
 

Haider’s death removes a key player in Austria

 
 
 

VIENNA – The death of Jörg Haider, a controversial and charismatic right-wing politician in Austria, has removed one of the country’s key players at a time of political turmoil following unprecedented far-right gains in last month’s general elections.

News Analysis

Haider, 58, was killed early Saturday when he lost control of his car and crashed while passing another vehicle at nearly 90 mph — twice the posted speed limit.

“For us it’s the end of the world,” Stefan Petzner, a spokesman for Haider’s Alliance for Austria’s Future party, tearfully told reporters. “Jörg Haider was a politician who changed the face of politics in this country.”

Jörg Haider, who transformed Austrian politics with the success of his far-right party, died in a car crash on Saturday. Dieter Zirnig/Creative Commons

Indeed, though he didn’t hold national office, Haider was arguably Austria’s best-known — and most polarizing — political figure. At the time of his death he was the governor of the Carinthia province.

Known for his anti-immigrant and anti-European Union policies, Haider was a populist who played on voter frustration with the status quo and an instinctive political animal who knew how to tailor his rhetoric, appearance, and demeanor to suit his target audiences.

“By constantly attacking Austria’s ruling elite and reminding working-class voters that they were getting precious little indeed from this system, Haider not only made his party a major player, he single-handedly forced the ruling elites to begin tacking ever rightwards,” said Edward Serotta, the director of Centropa, a Vienna-based research institute on Jewish life in Central Europe.

Handsome, athletic, and perpetually sun-tanned, Haider was dubbed the “yuppie fascist” by critics. The son of Nazi supporters, he won international notoriety in the 1990s with statements apparently praising the Hitler regime.

Haider led the far-right Freedom Party, or FPO, from 1986 to 2005, when he broke away to form the Alliance. Under his leadership the FPO won 27 percent of the vote in 1999, enabling the party to enter the government coalition. This sparked international sanctions, demonstrations and street riots, and prompted calls by Israel and Jewish groups to isolate the country.

Two years later, amid disarray and infighting, the party and its support collapsed.

In the Sept. 28 elections, however, the Alliance and the Freedom Party together made a stunning recovery, capturing 29 percent of the vote — 18 percent for the FPO and 11 percent for the Alliance.

The total, nearly triple what the far right won in elections two years ago, was the best showing for the far-right forces in Austria since World War II.

Anti-immigrant and anti-European Union rhetoric was only part of the appeal. Commentators said anger and frustration at the Social Democrats and the conservative People’s Party, the two mainstream parties that have divided power in Austria since World War II, played a major role.

“To conclude that close to 30 percent of all Austrians have suddenly ideologically moved to the right is certainly a false assumption,” wrote Vienna’s Die Presse newspaper. “The reasons for the comet-like rise of the right lies, rather, in the behavior of the long-established people’s parties. And this indeed poses a threat for the freedom of opinion and ideas in Austria.”

Der Standard newspaper was more succinct: “Angry voters vote for angry parties.”

Young voters in particular backed the far right, which many commentators found particularly worrisome. The far right captured nearly half of the voters younger than 30.

Salzburg-based historian Stan Nadel said this represented the most “shocking” aspect of the poll. These young voters “don’t, for the most part, seem to be hard-core fascists, but their willingness to accept the near neo-Nazi backgrounds and statements of the leaders of the two parties is a bit frightening,” he said.

“The far rightists campaign in the discos and among the young and, as a result, are often seen as ‘cool’ and ‘authentic’ by a generation whose political education seems to leave much to be desired.”

It is too soon to gauge the impact of Haider’s death on Austria’s political landscape. The electoral results had thrust both Haider and Freedom Party leader Hans Christian Strache into the political spotlight as the Peoples Party and the Social Democrats frantically sought to assemble a viable coalition.

“Strache may be well placed to come in first in the next election if the Social Democrats and the People’s Party don’t form a successful coalition,” Nadel said.

Conversely, Nadel and others said that without Haider’s charismatic presence, the far right could “implode.”

JTA

 
 
 
 
Add a Comment

Name:

Email:

Location:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the word you see in the image below:


Auto-login on future visits

Show my name in the online users list

Forgot your password?

 

Santorum a tough sell?

Social conservatism may be too much for Jewish vote

WASHINGTON – Rick Santorum’s near-win in Iowa and his fourth place finish in New Hampshire ahead of former House Speaker Newt Gingrich have made him the GOP’s latest “not Romney” candidate to beat. His status as the GOP right’s champion will be put to the test Jan. 21 in South Carolina’s Republican presidential primary. He may have his work cut out for him, however, in attracting Jewish support in the general election if he eventually manages to wrest the nomination from bruised frontrunner Gov. Mitt Romney.

Pro-Israel insiders say the Santorum campaign is now aggressively reaching out to Jewish givers who helped him when he was a U.S. senator from Pennsylvania.

 

The Norpac way

Choose candidate, send check

So you have decided you want to jump into the primary season.

Dr. Ben Chouake wants you to stop before writing a check to a Republican presidential candidate.

Instead, write a check to Norpac, the leading pro-Israel political action committee — and write the candidate’s name on the memo line.

Norpac passes the money on to the candidate’s campaign.

 

Norpac eyes the field

Post-Iowa assessment is positive, it says

Old friends. They are the ones hanging in and local supporters are pleased.

The Republican presidential field narrowed this week with the departure of Rep. Michelle Bachman.

With the notable exception of Rep. Ron Paul, who came in third in Iowa, the field is increasingly filled with people who are friends of the pro-Israel activists at Norpac.

Based in Englewood, Norpac is the largest pro-Israel political action committee, having raised more than a million dollars in the 2010 election cycle.

As of Sept. 30, it spent nearly $700,000 for the 2012 election cycle, more than it did for all of the 2008 elections.

 

RECENTLYADDED

Weiner quits Congress, apologizes for ‘personal mistakes’

WASHINGTON (JTA) -- Rep. Anthony Weiner resigned and apologized in the wake of a scandal in which he lied about sexually explicit exchanges on social media outlets.

“I am here today to apologize for the personal mistakes I have made and the embarrassment that I have caused,” Weiner (D-N.Y.) said at a news conference Thursday at a home for the elderly in Brooklyn where in the past he has announced his intention to run for office.

 

From praise to anger, Jewish response to Obama’s speech runs the gamut

WASHINGTON – From accolades like “compelling” to accusations like “Auschwitz borders” to radio silence, to label the Jewish response to President Obama’s speech on Middle East policy as diverse understates matters.

The very breadth of the Middle East policy speech — 5,600 words and covering the entire Middle East and decades of history — helps explain the wildly divergent responses from Jewish groups and opinion shapers, even among some who are otherwise often on the same page.

One could as easily pick out points for Israel — slamming the Palestinian Authority’s pact with Hamas as well as its bid for unilateral statehood — as one could the demerits — for many, the most explicit endorsement of the pre-1967 lines as the basis for future borders by any American president.

 

Obama: 1967 borders with swaps should serve as basis for negotiations

WASHINGTON – President Obama said the future state of Palestine should be based on the pre-1967 border with mutually agreed land swaps with Israel.

In his address Thursday afternoon on U.S. policy in the Middle East, Obama told an audience at the State Department that the borders of a “sovereign, nonmilitarized” Palestinian state “should be based on 1967 lines with mutually agreed swaps.”

Negotiations should focus first on territory and security, and then the difficult issues of the status of Jerusalem and what to do about the rights of Palestinian refugees can be broached, Obama said.

 
 
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29