Subscribe to The Jewish Standard free weekly newsletter

 
font size: +
 

Specter, Sestak woo Jewish voters in Pa.

 
 
 

ELKINS PARK, Pa. – With polls showing a tight race in the final weeks of Pennsylvania’s Democratic senatorial primary, incumbent Arlen Specter and challenger Joe Sestak are pressing for Jewish support.

In the case of Specter, the five-term Republican-turned-Democratic senator, that has meant taking the rare step of rebuking President Obama — over public criticism of Israel.

Both candidates spoke at a recent local event for the American Israel Public Affairs Committee and a candidates’ forum at the state’s largest synagogue, Reform Cong. Keneseth Israel, in the Philadelphia suburb of Elkins Park.

Sestak, in the U.S. House of Representatives, also sought and recently received a closed-door meeting with officials of the Jewish Federation of Greater Philadelphia and other communal leaders.

At stake in the May 18 election is the career of one of the longest-serving Jewish members of the Senate.

Regardless of the outcome, Specter’s decision last year to leave the GOP and run for re-election as a Democrat left the Senate without a Jewish Republican. More specifically, it also marked the first time in decades that a moderate GOP Jewish voice — embodied over the years not only by Specter but also Rudy Boschwitz of Minnesota, Warren Rudman of New Hampshire, and the late Jacob Javits of New York — was absent from the Senate.

Specter switched parties in the wake of his vote in favor of the federal stimulus package and poll numbers that showed he couldn’t win another GOP primary. He instantly received endorsements from top local and national Democrats, including key Jewish figures in the party.

Even during his decades as a Republican, Specter received support from Jewish backers who typically reserved their donations and votes for Democrats. In large part that was due to his liberal positions on a host of domestic issues — including abortion, church-state separation, and civil liberties — that often put him to the left of conservative Democrats from outside of his home turf of Philadelphia and the surrounding suburbs.

At the same time, Specter managed to command the support of the state’s Jewish Republicans and foreign policy hard-liners with his pro-Israel positions and support for stringent restrictions on U.S. funding for the Palestinian Authority.

And, of course, Specter always knew how to work a Jewish crowd.

Specter can likely count on the support of many of the Jewish community’s movers and shakers, and he had his backers at Sunday’s May 2 event at Keneseth Israel, attended largely by senior citizens.

Still, Sestak, a retired admiral, has been working the Jewish community hard. Unwilling to cede any ground on that front, he has been reaching out to Jews publicly and behind the scenes throughout the campaign.

Polls of Democratic voters show Sestak gaining on Specter, with at least one survey showing the challenger with a slight lead.

When Specter switched parties last spring to run as a Democrat — in part to avoid the GOP primary against challenger Pat Toomey — he portrayed himself as a staunch ally of the president. And in an interview with the Jewish Exponent in November — before the latest flare-up over settlements between the United States and Israel but after tension between Jerusalem and Washington had been simmering over the issue — Specter was reluctant to criticize Obama directly.

In a March speech on the Senate floor, he urged both Jerusalem and Washington to cool down their rhetoric, but refrained from outright criticism of the president.

In remarks at Keneseth Israel, however, Specter took direct aim at Obama. The senator told the crowd that the president’s “heart is in the right place” on Israel, but that Obama needed more information and experience when it comes to the Middle East.

“I say publicly: You are wrong, Mr. President,” Specter said, referring to the administration’s call for Israel to cease building in eastern Jerusalem and news reports of Obama’s private chastising of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

“Jerusalem is where we Jews have built for thousands of years. It is different from the rest of the west bank,” he said to the crowd of 60 people.

About twice that number were on hand to listen to Sestak, who spoke before the incumbent. In contrast to their televised debate the night before, Specter and Sestak were not in the room at the same time.

Specter added that in the wake of diplomatic tension that arose when Israel announced building plans as Vice President Joe Biden was visiting, Israel’s ambassador to the United States sought his advice almost immediately. Specter recalled that he cautioned the ambassador, Michael Oren, to avoid using the word “crisis” in describing U.S.-Israeli relations.

Oren confirmed the exchange, saying that Specter was one of the legislators he approached to clarify Israel’s position on Jerusalem.

“The senator’s advice and insights were much appreciated,” Oren told the Exponent.

Sestak used most of his appearance at Keneseth Israel to focus on domestic issues such as health care. But when asked about Israel, Sestak — who has taken flak for, among other things, signing a congressional letter in January urging Israel to lift its economic blockade of Gaza — spoke about his meetings with Israeli security officials, including his efforts to help Israel gain access to an American-made combat ship.

He also offered his own assessment that could be considered an indirect criticism of the administration’s approach, although his campaign spokesman said it was more about moving forward than criticizing the president.

“Israel will be less willing to take risks for peace if it doesn’t feel the U.S. is 100 percent behind it,” Sestak said. “I strongly believe that Israel is our vital ally, but I honestly do believe that we and Israel are both more secure when there is peace.”

Jewish Exponent

 
 
 
amy eden posted 16 May 2010 at 02:47 PM

as cons/ref Jews become extinct Jewish pols will also become extinct and arlin sphinkter will be one of the first to go bye bye
too bad nobody listened to me when I first warned of the situation 20+yrs ago

 
Add a Comment

Name:

Email:

Location:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the word you see in the image below:


Auto-login on future visits

Show my name in the online users list

Forgot your password?

 

‘Historic partnership’ recalled

Rosenwald Schools had national impact

In the late 1800s, seeking funds to build Alabama’s Tuskegee University — then Tuskegee Normal School — the author and educator Booker T. Washington went up north to solicit help from known philanthropists. Among them was Chicago resident Julius Rosenwald, president of Sears, Roebuck, and Co.

“A lot of northern philanthropists were looking to help out with education in the South,” said Tracy Hayes, field officer and project manager for the Rosenwald Schools Initiative of the National Trust for Historic Preservation.

In the end, she said, Rosenwald’s contribution would help not just Tuskegee, but the cause of public education throughout the south — and the nation as a whole. Through his efforts, some 5,000 schools were opened for African American children, some of which still function today.

 

Tending to the liberators

March of Living honors vets, with N.J. doctor in tow

Englewood resident Dr. David Arbit has spent much of his adult life hearing about the Shoah.

“My father-in-law is a survivor,” says the physician, who practices in Fair Lawn. “At every bar- or bat mitzvah, he would get up and speak about his experiences.”

Now, however, Arbit can add many more firsthand accounts to those he already knows. As the physician designated by the March of the Living program to accompany this year’s honorees — some 16 former U.S. servicemen who were among the first to arrive at Europe’s many concentration camps during World War II — the doctor says he now has both new information and detailed verification of his father-in-law’s stories.

 

Tears in Teaneck

Lipstadt keynotes annual Shoah event

It was an emotional, bittersweet Teaneck Holocaust commemoration this year. Perhaps it was because long-time residents Arlene Duker, who lost her daughter to Arab terrorists many years ago, and Rabbi Johnny Krug, a son of survivors and dean of student life and welfare at Frisch High School, read the family names of those who were lost in the Shoah. Among them were Backenroth, Flanzbaum, Malca, Jacobowitz, Adler, Bacall, Goldberg, Greenwald, Morris, Kraar, Taffet, Lewkowitz, Weissler, Rosenberg, Hampel, Stern, and many other familiar names — all neighbors, all second generation, all families with decades-deep roots in Teaneck, tied together by the tragedies of the Shoah and the triumph of survival.

Teaneckers have played an important role in shaping Holocaust education since 1979, so it was appropriate for Deborah Lipstadt, the keynote speaker, to talk about the Adolf Eichmann trial and the politics surrounding it. Earlier in the evening, she told The Jewish Standard that the trial 50 years ago gave the world a universal view of the Shoah, because for the first time, survivors gave testimony.

 

RECENTLYADDED

Weiner quits Congress, apologizes for ‘personal mistakes’

WASHINGTON (JTA) -- Rep. Anthony Weiner resigned and apologized in the wake of a scandal in which he lied about sexually explicit exchanges on social media outlets.

“I am here today to apologize for the personal mistakes I have made and the embarrassment that I have caused,” Weiner (D-N.Y.) said at a news conference Thursday at a home for the elderly in Brooklyn where in the past he has announced his intention to run for office.

 

From praise to anger, Jewish response to Obama’s speech runs the gamut

WASHINGTON – From accolades like “compelling” to accusations like “Auschwitz borders” to radio silence, to label the Jewish response to President Obama’s speech on Middle East policy as diverse understates matters.

The very breadth of the Middle East policy speech — 5,600 words and covering the entire Middle East and decades of history — helps explain the wildly divergent responses from Jewish groups and opinion shapers, even among some who are otherwise often on the same page.

One could as easily pick out points for Israel — slamming the Palestinian Authority’s pact with Hamas as well as its bid for unilateral statehood — as one could the demerits — for many, the most explicit endorsement of the pre-1967 lines as the basis for future borders by any American president.

 

Obama: 1967 borders with swaps should serve as basis for negotiations

WASHINGTON – President Obama said the future state of Palestine should be based on the pre-1967 border with mutually agreed land swaps with Israel.

In his address Thursday afternoon on U.S. policy in the Middle East, Obama told an audience at the State Department that the borders of a “sovereign, nonmilitarized” Palestinian state “should be based on 1967 lines with mutually agreed swaps.”

Negotiations should focus first on territory and security, and then the difficult issues of the status of Jerusalem and what to do about the rights of Palestinian refugees can be broached, Obama said.

 
 
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31