Subscribe to The Jewish Standard free weekly newsletter

 
font size: +
 

Study: Young US Jews don’t see Israel as campaign issue

 
 
 

When young, non-Orthodox American Jews vote in next week’s US elections, they will be far less likely than their elders to be thinking about Israel’s security, according to the 2008 National Survey of American Jews, sponsored by the Berman Jewish Policy Archive at New York University.

The key finding of the study, released over the weekend: Just 29 percent of non-Orthodox Jews younger than 35 say “the situation involving Israel and the Palestinians” is either “high” or “very high” as a consideration in determining their vote for president.

That figure nearly doubles to 54% among non-Orthodox Jews over 65, and stands at 39% for those aged 35-54.

The figure among young non-Orthodox Jews was similar to that of non-Jews (26%) found in a parallel simultaneous national survey.

At 81%, Orthodox young adults report the highest concern for Israel among their peers, a figure as high as that of their elders. Among all Jews, the figure stands at 52%.

Regarding the young non-Orthodox demographic, the study found that the detachment from Israel was not connected to a detachment from Judaism.

“Thus, it’s not that they care less about being Jewish and thus care less about Israel - their “Jewish-caring” levels match their elders. Diminished concern with Israel in the election does NOT reflect diminished importance attached to being Jewish,” the study states.

“Younger non-Orthodox Jews are no less likely than their elders to say that being Jewish is important or very important to them,” reads the study.

Among the non-Orthodox, 81% rate being Jewish as “somewhat” or “very” important to them, with no difference between older and younger respondents.

The study noticed a marked rise in visits to Israel among American Jews, attributing this partly to birthright Israel. 36% of non-Orthodox Jews under 35 have visited Israel, compared to 37% of non-Orthodox Jews of their parents’ generation - a marked increase considering that they had fewer years in which to make the visit.

Seventeen percent of the young Jews came on a second visit, compared to just 13% of their parents’ generation.

Of second trips, the study finds: “It is only among those who’ve visited Israel twice that the age-related gap in Israel-concern disappears. Each trip to Israel is associated with leaps in levels of caring about Israel as a factor in the presidential election. However, for young people especially, the second trip to Israel is the true watershed in boosting their caring for Israel.”

In all, “with the passage of time, not only is the level of attachment to Israel likely to decline among non-Orthodox Jews, but so too is the breadth of political support for the Jewish state. That said, expanded repeat travel to Israel consisting of two or more visits appears capable of offsetting these declines.”

www.jpost.com

 
 

A chant encounter with God

How a Paramus teen grew into a rabbi in search of heaven’s gate

“I think I remember you. You were the weird one.”

That, according to Rabbi Shefa Gold, was what one of the first people to “teach me that Judaism could be a path with passion, because he had such passion” said when she encountered him again at a conference years later.

If weird means intense, unusual, inner-directed to a fault (in a way that no doubt could be called willful by detractors), God-intoxicated, and supremely self-confident, then there is no doubt her teacher was right.

 

Charge it!

Former Fair Lawn man talks about his new electric car

The first thing you notice about David Kleid’s new electric sedan is the quiet.

Driving up the hills toward Jerusalem from his home in Ma’aleh Adumim, Kleid’s shiny blue Renault Fluence emits barely a whisper.

But the lack of noise is not what motivated the former Fair Lawn resident to lease the Fluence through Better Place, the U.S.-Israeli electric car company that aims to set up Israel as a replicable model for the rest of the world — if enough David Kleids are willing to give it a test drive.

Kleid, a physician in the pediatric intensive care unit at Hadassah University Medical Center-Ein Karem in Jerusalem, does not consider himself an “early adopter” type. The all-electric Renault appealed to him mainly for its ability to free him from the gas pump.

 

Talking to the Wall

Much praise, high hopes, for Sharansky proposal for Kotel prayer

The Kotel, the western retaining wall of the Temple in Jerusalem, has symbolized the symbolic heart of the Jewish people for two thousand years. It has been a unifying vision, the magnet that drew the iron in each one of us.

When it was retaken by Israeli soldiers in June 1967, and Jews once again were able to draw near to it, it represented both victory and hope, although some people, here and in Israel, complained about the “bicycle racks” that separated men from women almost as soon as the area was cleared and the Western Wall was opened to the public. Still, the Wall was a symbol of Jewish unity and pride.

 

RECENTLYADDED

Weiner quits Congress, apologizes for ‘personal mistakes’

WASHINGTON (JTA) -- Rep. Anthony Weiner resigned and apologized in the wake of a scandal in which he lied about sexually explicit exchanges on social media outlets.

“I am here today to apologize for the personal mistakes I have made and the embarrassment that I have caused,” Weiner (D-N.Y.) said at a news conference Thursday at a home for the elderly in Brooklyn where in the past he has announced his intention to run for office.

 

From praise to anger, Jewish response to Obama’s speech runs the gamut

WASHINGTON – From accolades like “compelling” to accusations like “Auschwitz borders” to radio silence, to label the Jewish response to President Obama’s speech on Middle East policy as diverse understates matters.

The very breadth of the Middle East policy speech — 5,600 words and covering the entire Middle East and decades of history — helps explain the wildly divergent responses from Jewish groups and opinion shapers, even among some who are otherwise often on the same page.

One could as easily pick out points for Israel — slamming the Palestinian Authority’s pact with Hamas as well as its bid for unilateral statehood — as one could the demerits — for many, the most explicit endorsement of the pre-1967 lines as the basis for future borders by any American president.

 

Obama: 1967 borders with swaps should serve as basis for negotiations

WASHINGTON – President Obama said the future state of Palestine should be based on the pre-1967 border with mutually agreed land swaps with Israel.

In his address Thursday afternoon on U.S. policy in the Middle East, Obama told an audience at the State Department that the borders of a “sovereign, nonmilitarized” Palestinian state “should be based on 1967 lines with mutually agreed swaps.”

Negotiations should focus first on territory and security, and then the difficult issues of the status of Jerusalem and what to do about the rights of Palestinian refugees can be broached, Obama said.

 
 
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31